Keep market space for Newmarket

There’s a new attempt to application to convert space intended for a market to a convenience shop.

The space is on Newmarket and Mill Street in the Liberties – previously where the Green Door Market was. The site was redeveloped several years ago on condition that they had a market space.

For the second time, developers are trying to wriggle out of this condition. Below is my planning observation for this case – here is the one I wrote previously when we successfully stopped them in 2022.

The case is open for observations until 19th November 2024.


A chara,

I am writing to oppose application 4346/24 from Patrizia Eight Building Ltd. I do so on three main grounds:

1. Danger of precedent

The applicant yet again attempts to wriggle out of an obligation under their previous planning permission to provide a space for a market.

Their initial planning permission saw the removal of an existing market, and their original planning permission was granted on the basis that they retain/build some replacement market space.

The applicant has repeatedly sought to extricate themselves from this requirement – these attempts have been rightfully rejected at both council and An Bord Pleanála levels.

They make the case for this application largely on the basis of their claim that they could not find a market tenant for the site paying commercial rates – but this in itself is not sufficient to free the applicant of their obligations.

The planning condition for a market was essentially a trade off – the applicant gets to do the development, but they have to keep a market space. The applicant was aware of this trade off when developing the site and chose to proceed. If they are unable to find a tenant for the site at commercial rates, the option open to them is to offer the space at a loss and fulfil their side of the trade off.

It would be an extremely dangerous precedent if the planning authority were to permit a development on a given condition, and then waive that condition in future based on claims of insufficient profitability by the applicant. 

2. Development Plan’s provisions for markets in area

Separately, the new city development plan contains various provisions which support markets in general and in this specific area. In particular:

– SDRA 15 covers this area and sets a goal for the area: “To support the use of Newmarket Square for market trading and other beneficial public uses…”

– SDRA 15 also states: “Community and cultural uses at Newmarket Square should be protected into the future.”

–  Policy CCUV33 sets “Support for Markets” as an objective, saying: “To facilitate indoor and outdoor markets both in the city centre and throughout the city particularly where they support the existing retail offer and local produce/start up enterprise and the circular economy; and to realise their potential as a tourist attraction.”

These provisions should give planners pause before approving the massive reduction in market space.

3. Provision already made

Finally, planners should note that there is already provision for a similarly sized (437sq m) retail unit immediately beside this site. Planning application LRD6028/24-S3 was granted at the end of October 2024. This significantly undercuts the applicant’s case for a need for more retail on the site, and bolsters the case for retaining the existing conditions.

I ask that planners once again reject this attempt.

Is mise,

Cllr. Michael Pidgeon

City Hall, Dame Street, Dublin 2

Appealed: we still don’t need slot machines in Dolphin’s Barn

There was an application to build an “amusement centre” – really a slot machine hall – in Dolphin’s Barn, back in mid-2024. I put in an objection and the council rejected the plan.

But now the developer is back appealing it to An Bord Pleanála.

Below is my rebuttal of their appeal, which builds on my previous objection and responds to the points made by the developer who is appealing it. You can read their appeal here.

Continue reading “Appealed: we still don’t need slot machines in Dolphin’s Barn”

Coming to Dublin by train and ferry from Brussels

Dublin is proudly hosting the European Greens Congress in December 2024.

A number of people have been in touch about how to come to Dublin without flying. I previously did a guide on travelling between Ireland and the UK by ferry and train, so this post is a simple guide for people who want to do the same thing from the continent.

Continue reading “Coming to Dublin by train and ferry from Brussels”

Why I’m against the “amusement centre” plan in Dolphin’s Barn

Below is a planning observation I sent in on plans for an “amusement centre” proposed for Dolphin’s Barn. The full project details are here and observations wereopen until 28 August 2024.

UPDATE: Dublin City Council thankfully REJECTED this application in September 2024. The full decision is here. The developer has now appealed to An Bord Pleanála – I will be submitting a further objection there.

Continue reading “Why I’m against the “amusement centre” plan in Dolphin’s Barn”

Dubliners don’t need more delays with traffic plan – Greens

Green city councillors slam Minister Emer Higgins’ “bizarre intervention” on behalf of car park owners

Dublin City Council should push ahead with their traffic plans for the city centre, the eight Green councillors have said.

They rejected calls by Minister Emer Higgins for the scheme to be delayed, criticising her intervention as “bizarre”.

The initial stages of the plan would see two new short bus lanes on Aston Quay and Bachelor’s Walk, plus a new junction layout at Pearse Street. 

Research found that 60% of car traffic in the city centre is passing through – without stopping to shop. The plan aims to reduce this through traffic and make Dublin city centre a more attractive destination.

An extensive consultation process on the plan was completed in 2023, with over 3,500 submissions made by business, residents and charities across the city. The city councillors have debated and voted on the plan several times in the past year, each time recommending its implementation.

The city council has aimed to start work in August of this year, but has faced objections from the Dublin City Centre Traders Alliance, a small lobby group mostly composed of car park owners.

Green Party group leader on Dublin City Council, Cllr. Michael Pidgeon said:

“Dubliners are sick of waiting. Waiting in traffic, waiting for buses, and now a minister wants them to wait for plans to fix up our city centre.

“This last-ditch intervention by Minister Emer Higgins is utterly bizarre. She is doing the work of vested interests – car park owners who fear any progress that would undermine their bottom line.

“Dublin city’s design cannot be dictated by car park owners. City council management should stick to their guns. It’s time to implement this plan, improve the bus, and make the core city centre a better place to be.”

Local Green councillor Claire Byrne said:

“By talking this traffic out of the city centre, Dublin will be a much better place to work, shop and live. It will improve the air quality and make our streets safer to walk or cycle along. We need to get past the idea that all customers in a city drive.

“In short, this plan is about giving the city back to people, making it a living city again rather than one that is dominated by cars racing through it. This is exactly the sort of measure we need to achieve our climate targets.”

Green councillor Ray Cunningham said:

“The Dublin City Traffic Plan is aimed at limiting through traffic only – the cars that will never stop and shop in the city centre. It is precisely this traffic that is bad for business. 

“It means that those who do genuinely want to come into the city, to shop, to eat or for entertainment are getting caught up in horrendous traffic jams. This type of car-jam system doesn’t work for anyone.”

Deputy Lord Mayor of Dublin, Donna Cooney, said:

“Retail and tourism thrive in low-traffic areas. We’ve seen this evidence in cities around the world.

“When you create space for people to linger and enjoy, it is better for Dubliners and visitors.”

Delivering for Dublin: a political agreement for the City Council

Below is a political agreement reached in June 2024 between Dublin City Councillors from Fine Gael, Fianna Fáil, the Green Party and the Labour Party. It aims to run from 2024 until 2029.

Continue reading “Delivering for Dublin: a political agreement for the City Council”

Camac flood risk: what is being done?

The River Camac is one of the main tributaries to the Liffey, but carries a risk of flooding. In 2011, there was a particularly bad flood which submerged homes, caused huge damage, and leaves many residents in the area understandably concerned and often unable to access insurance.

Continue reading “Camac flood risk: what is being done?”